comparision between microsoft project and ganttproject

#COMPARISION BETWEEN MICROSOFT PROJECT AND GANTTPROJECT PROFESSIONAL#

Level of Effort (LOE) activities are those that are required for the management of the project but that are not linked to a specific deliverable. Again, there is no hard and fast rule to what is better it comes down to what you would prefer to use and the scheduling and control processes that have been chosen. The critical path route also has advantages. Therefore, there are some advantages to making sure you can easily identify the route through the project that is going to take the most time because that’s where to focus if you need to get creative with the delivery dates. If you can shave time off of activities on the longest path, you can get the project delivered more quickly. You could have a situation where there are critical activities but they aren’t on the longest path. The longest path could be the same as the critical path, but that’s not always the case. Microsoft Project uses the critical activities to create the critical path.

#COMPARISION BETWEEN MICROSOFT PROJECT AND GANTTPROJECT PROFESSIONAL#

Primavera P6 Professional uses the longest path critical activity definition. Critical activitiesīoth tools have different options for showing the activities that are going to have the most impact on schedule delay. The consideration here is what your planning process is and whether a formal WBS is created at the beginning. Neither approach is right or wrong: top-down and bottom-up both get you to the same place – a complete view of what you have to do in order to complete the project to the required specification. In our experience, most people start with tasks and then build up from the bottom. Microsoft Project will allow you to create a WBS hierarchy, but the way it’s approached is different. Then you can group them under a summary task and indent the levels to represent the activities or deliverables that the project will create. In other words, you need a list of tasks first. Microsoft Project lends itself to a bottom-up approach to scheduling. Once all the deliverables are in, you can add the tasks required to make sure they are completed. The first thing you have to do in Primavera is set up the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). This should (in theory) be quite straightforward as you have the information from the project brief or business case. That means you first work out what you are delivering or what the end result is going to be. Primavera P6 Professional takes a top-down approach to scheduling. So, Primavera P6 vs Microsoft Project? Let’s take a look at some differences to help inform your decision. They are both decent scheduling tools depending on what you are looking for. Well, it depends on your definition of ‘better’! We spend a lot of time leading or supporting Primavera implementations, but also have plenty of experience working with the Microsoft suite. When we’re delivering training, we hear this question a lot: “Is Primavera P6 better than Microsoft Project?” Primavera P6 vs Microsoft Project: The DifferencesĪre you trying to make the decision between whether to adopt Primavera P6 or Microsoft Project?

Comparision between microsoft project and ganttproject